Problem: Find the difference between the sum of the squares of the first one hundred natural numbers and the square of the sum.

Commentary: I taught a variety of freshman math courses at my university for roughly 5 years. As such, this problem is very near and dear to my heart.**

I can’t tell you how many kids show up at university thinking they’re hot shits because they took Calc 1 in high school, but don’t know that

This is just one of many adorable things freshmen tend to belive, along with all their ridiculous political beliefs and thinking they’ll somehow change the world in any appreciable way. Adorable.

Actually, students thinking that the sum of the squares is equal to the square of the sum is so common, that it has its own name. We call it the “freshman dream”. I’ve also heard it called “Baby’s Binomial Theorem”, which is way funnier, but much less commonly heard. And since I guess I have to mention it, there are number-like structures out there where the freshman dream is true (fields of characteristic 2 for my algebros), but the real numbers certainly aren’t one of them.

What’s especially funny about this misunderstanding is that it’s literally almost never true (for real numbers). Pick your favorite two numbers–they don’t even have to be integers. They can even be the same number. Unless one (or both) of them is zero, then tada, the sum of the squares isn’t equal to the square of the sum.

So what other crazy (mathematical) things do university students tend to come up with in freshman math class? Just on the order of basic arithmetic, it’s almost shocking how little mastery they have over the subject. And we’re not talking about “complicated” things like the limit, integration, or any other worthless calculus crap. This is arithmetic. Our university students don’t understand arithmetic.

Just off the top of my head, these are some of the most common misunderstandings, not counting that mentioned above. Keep in mind, everything that follows is not true, and what’s more, they’re not true for practically any numbers you throw at them (try it yourself!)

And that’s not even getting into logarithms or trigonometry, which none of them understand.

This has a lot to do with why I gave up teaching for the cushy office life. I haven’t looked back since.

R Code:

ElapsedTime<-system.time({
##########################
answer <- abs(sum((1:100)^2)-sum((1:100))^2)
##########################
})[3]
ElapsedMins<-floor(ElapsedTime/60)
ElapsedSecs<-(ElapsedTime-ElapsedMins*60)
cat(sprintf("
The answer is: %d
Total elapsed time: %d minutes and
%f seconds
", answer, ElapsedMins, ElapsedSecs))

Output: The answer is: 25164150 Total elapsed time: 0 minutes and 0.000000 seconds